књига басед тест «Spiral Dynamics:
Mastering Values, Leadership, and
Change» (ISBN-13: 978-1405133562)
Спонзори
Afrikaans
Azərbaycan
Bosanski
Català
Cebuano
Chichewa
Corsu
Cymraeg
Dansk
Deutsch
Eesti
English
Español
Esperanto
Euskara
Filipino
Français
Frysk
Gaeilge
Galego
Gàidhlig na h-Alba
Hausa
Hawaiʻi
Hmoob
Hrvatski
Igbo
Indonesia
Italiano
Jawa
Kinyarwanda
Kreyòl Ayisyen
Kurdî
Latinus
Latviski
Lietuvių
Lëtzebuergesch
Magyar
Malagasy
Malti
Maori
Melayu
Nederlands
Norske
O'zbek
Polskie
Português
Română
Samoa
Sesotho
Shona
Shqip
Slovenski
Slovenský
Soomaali
Sunda
Suomen
Svenska
Tiếng Việt
Türkmenler
Türkçe
Yoruba
Zulu
isiXhosa
kiswahili
Íslenska
Čeština
Ελληνικά
Беларуская
Български
Кыргызча
Македонски
Монгол
Русский
Српски
Татар
Тоҷикӣ
Українська
Қазақ
հայերեն
יידיש
עִברִית
ئۇيغۇرچە
اردو
سنڌي
عربي
فارسی
پښتو
नेपाली
मराठी
हिन्दी
বাংলা
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ
ગુજરાતી
ଓଡିଆ
தமிழ்
తెలుగు
ಕನ್ನಡ
മലയാളം
සිංහල
ไทย
ພາສາລາວ
မြန်မာ
ქართული
አማርኛ
ខ្មែរ
中文(简体)
日本
한국인

Psychological Analysis of Fear-Based Healthcare Messaging: Comparing HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 Through the Lens of Spiral Dynamics

Dr. Tomás Campbell [1], a member of the BPS Division of Clinical Psychology Faculty for HIV and Sexual Health, article "Towards more inclusive and Empowering Healthcare Campaigns" [2] presents a compelling analysis of the evolution of HIV/AIDS messaging over four decades, tracing a path from fear-based approaches to more empowering, inclusive strategies. This progression reflects significant advances in both medical understanding and psychological approaches to public health communication. 

The SDTEST® survey data on fears provides an excellent opportunity to examine how these evolving messaging strategies align with contemporary fear psychology and value systems as described by Spiral Dynamics theory.


Comparative Analysis of HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 Fear Prevalence


The SDTEST® survey "Fears" involving 3,679 participants across 105 countries reveals that HIV/AIDS now ranks relatively low at 4%, while COVID-19 ranks even lower at just 2%. Below is a abridged version of the survey results. The full results are available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.


Страхови

цхартсКорелација
?
Ова функција аутоматски израчунава линеарну и нелинеарну корелацију. Пре него што извршите анализу корелације, направите дијаграм расејања да бисте проверили природу односа. Коефицијенти корелације су значајни само ако је претпостављени тип везе визуелно или аналитички потврђен.
VUCA
?
Ево нове интерфејс приказа на корелацију у табели по нивоима спиралне динамике у којој се воле волатилност, неизвесност, сложеност и двосмисленост (V.U.C.A.) се приказују путем позитивних и негативних за зависности од одговора анкете и боје од спиралне динамике
земља
Језик
-
Mail
Прерадити
Врста корелације
линеарно (Пеарсон)
линеарно (Пеарсон)
Нелинеарни (Спеарман)
Критична вредност коефицијента корелације
Нормална дистрибуција, Виллиам Сеали Госсет (Студент)
Нормална дистрибуција, Виллиам Сеали Госсет (Студент)
Нон нормална дистрибуција, од стране Спеарман-а
ДистрибуцијаНе
нормално
Не
нормално
Не
нормално
НормаланНормаланНормаланНормаланНормалан
Сва питања
Сва питања
Мој највећи страх је
Мој највећи страх је
Answer 1-
Слабо позитивно
0.0478
Слабо позитивно
0.0244
Слаб негативан
-0.0219
Слабо позитивно
0.0983
Слабо позитивно
0.0347
Слаб негативан
-0.0126
Слаб негативан
-0.1503
Answer 2-
Слабо позитивно
0.0248
Слабо позитивно
0.0004
Слаб негативан
-0.0415
Слабо позитивно
0.0610
Слабо позитивно
0.0462
Слабо позитивно
0.0141
Слаб негативан
-0.0981
Answer 3-
Слаб негативан
-0.0017
Слабо позитивно
0.0065
Слаб негативан
-0.0473
Слаб негативан
-0.0429
Слабо позитивно
0.0417
Слабо позитивно
0.0743
Слаб негативан
-0.0236
Answer 4-
Слабо позитивно
0.0458
Слабо позитивно
0.0329
Слаб негативан
-0.0273
Слабо позитивно
0.0181
Слабо позитивно
0.0358
Слабо позитивно
0.0214
Слаб негативан
-0.1008
Answer 5-
Слабо позитивно
0.0206
Слабо позитивно
0.1303
Слабо позитивно
0.0042
Слабо позитивно
0.0843
Слаб негативан
-0.0006
Слаб негативан
-0.0124
Слаб негативан
-0.1819
Answer 6-
Слабо позитивно
0.0052
Слабо позитивно
0.0160
Слаб негативан
-0.0639
Слаб негативан
-0.0117
Слабо позитивно
0.0156
Слабо позитивно
0.0861
Слаб негативан
-0.0358
Answer 7-
Слабо позитивно
0.0074
Слабо позитивно
0.0443
Слаб негативан
-0.0684
Слаб негативан
-0.0339
Слабо позитивно
0.0452
Слабо позитивно
0.0744
Слаб негативан
-0.0511
Answer 8-
Слабо позитивно
0.0628
Слабо позитивно
0.0860
Слаб негативан
-0.0291
Слабо позитивно
0.0109
Слабо позитивно
0.0343
Слабо позитивно
0.0164
Слаб негативан
-0.1357
Answer 9-
Слабо позитивно
0.0776
Слабо позитивно
0.1617
Слаб негативан
-0.0013
Слабо позитивно
0.0613
Слаб негативан
-0.0089
Слаб негативан
-0.0494
Слаб негативан
-0.1771
Answer 10-
Слабо позитивно
0.0800
Слабо позитивно
0.0624
Слаб негативан
-0.0152
Слабо позитивно
0.0234
Слабо позитивно
0.0394
Слаб негативан
-0.0083
Слаб негативан
-0.1359
Answer 11-
Слабо позитивно
0.0677
Слабо позитивно
0.0565
Слаб негативан
-0.0084
Слабо позитивно
0.0088
Слабо позитивно
0.0237
Слабо позитивно
0.0185
Слаб негативан
-0.1245
Answer 12-
Слабо позитивно
0.0411
Слабо позитивно
0.1032
Слаб негативан
-0.0373
Слабо позитивно
0.0354
Слабо позитивно
0.0276
Слабо позитивно
0.0253
Слаб негативан
-0.1515
Answer 13-
Слабо позитивно
0.0734
Слабо позитивно
0.1017
Слаб негативан
-0.0379
Слабо позитивно
0.0275
Слабо позитивно
0.0310
Слабо позитивно
0.0132
Слаб негативан
-0.1581
Answer 14-
Слабо позитивно
0.0850
Слабо позитивно
0.0930
Слаб негативан
-0.0075
Слаб негативан
-0.0148
Слабо позитивно
0.0044
Слабо позитивно
0.0091
Слаб негативан
-0.1151
Answer 15-
Слабо позитивно
0.0606
Слабо позитивно
0.1304
Слаб негативан
-0.0329
Слабо позитивно
0.0107
Слаб негативан
-0.0203
Слабо позитивно
0.0232
Слаб негативан
-0.1178
Answer 16-
Слабо позитивно
0.0712
Слабо позитивно
0.0323
Слаб негативан
-0.0362
Слаб негативан
-0.0430
Слабо позитивно
0.0651
Слабо позитивно
0.0139
Слаб негативан
-0.0708


Извоз у МС Екцел
Ова функционалност ће бити доступна у сопственим анкетама VUCA
У реду

This modest fear prevalence contrasts sharply with the historical positioning of HIV/AIDS as a primary existential threat during the 1980s-90s. As the article aptly notes, early HIV/AIDS campaigns relied heavily on fear-based messaging, leveraging protection-motivation theory to drive behavioral change through graphic depictions of mortality and disease. The current survey results suggest these diseases have been partially normalized in the public consciousness, supporting the article's observation that medical advancements have transformed HIV from a death sentence to a manageable chronic condition.


When examining broader fear contexts, it's noteworthy that personal concerns about "illness of relatives and children" (11%) and general "illness" (8%) outrank specific disease fears like HIV/AIDS or COVID-19. This pattern indicates that abstract illness threats generate more anxiety than particular diseases that have been subject to extensive public education campaigns. This finding aligns with the article's discussion of how healthcare messaging has evolved toward destigmatization and normalization, particularly for HIV/AIDS.


Spiral Dynamics Correlations: Understanding Value Systems and Fear Responses


The correlation data between disease fears and Spiral Dynamics stages provides fascinating insights into how different value systems engage with health threats. HIV/AIDS shows a positive correlation (0.0662) with Orange-level thinking, which represents achievement-oriented, strategic value systems. This alignment makes psychological sense, as Orange thinking prioritizes personal agency and risk management. Individuals operating from this value system may respond more actively to diseases perceived as consequences of personal behavior choices.


Conversely, HIV/AIDS fears correlate negatively with Yellow (-0.0516) and more strongly with Turquoise (-0.1776) value systems. These second-tier thinking systems in Spiral Dynamics represent more complex, integrative worldviews that may contextualize disease within a broader systemic understanding. The stronger negative correlation with Turquoise thinking is particularly notable, as this holistic perspective tends to integrate mortality and vulnerability into a comprehensive worldview, potentially reducing fear responses to specific conditions.


For COVID-19, the correlation pattern differs significantly. The positive correlation with Green thinking (0.0637) suggests that communitarian, egalitarian value systems may experience heightened concern about highly communicable diseases that threaten community well-being. This aligns with the article's discussion of how modern healthcare campaigns increasingly emphasize collective responsibility and community protection. The negative correlations with Blue (-0.0342), Orange (-0.0409), and Turquoise (-0.0748) value systems suggest varied psychological responses across the spiral.


Implications for Evolving Healthcare Messaging


The article chronicles a shift from fear-based campaigns toward empowerment and behavioral strategies, noting how psychological frameworks like self-efficacy theory and social norm theory have informed this evolution. The SDTEST® data supports the efficacy of this shift by demonstrating relatively low fear ratings for HIV/AIDS despite its historical stigma. This suggests that destigmatizing, empowering messaging approaches may have successfully normalized the condition in public consciousness.


The varying correlations between fears and Spiral Dynamics stages also validate the article's emphasis on intersectionality and tailored messaging. Different value systems appear to process disease threats through distinct psychological frameworks, which has significant implications for public health communication. The article notes that "campaigns are now much more carefully designed to address diverse populations," which aligns with the need to consider value system diversity in designing effective interventions.


Advancing Psychologically Informed Healthcare Communications


The relatively weak correlation between disease fears and specific Spiral Dynamics stages (with the critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0323) suggests that fears of HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 transcend value systems but manifest differently within them. This finding supports the article's conclusion that messaging must "remain effective, compassionate, and mindful of nuance." The positive correlation between HIV/AIDS fears and Orange thinking, contrasted with COVID-19's positive correlation with Green thinking, demonstrates how different diseases activate different value concerns.


The article's discussion of digital and social media platforms as vectors for modern healthcare messaging presents opportunities for even more targeted value-specific communications. Understanding the psychological frameworks through which different Spiral Dynamics stages process health information could enable micro-targeted campaigns that resonate more effectively with diverse audiences. For instance, messaging aimed at Orange-dominant thinkers might emphasize personal agency and achievement in health management, while Green-focused messaging might highlight community protection and collective responsibility.


Conclusion


The evolution of HIV/AIDS messaging described in the article reflects a sophisticated understanding of psychological principles, moving from protection-motivation theory toward self-efficacy and social norm approaches. The SDTEST® data validates this progression by showing relatively modest contemporary fear responses to HIV/AIDS despite its historical stigmatization. The correlation patterns between disease fears and Spiral Dynamics stages provide valuable insights for further refining healthcare communications to resonate with different value systems.


The comparative data between HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 fears, particularly their different correlation patterns with Spiral Dynamics stages, suggests that disease characteristics interact with value systems to produce distinct psychological responses. As the article argues, effective healthcare campaigns must continue to evolve based on evidence rather than prejudice. The SDTEST® data offers this evidence, demonstrating how fears of specific conditions correlate with different psychological frameworks and value systems.


This integration of fear psychology, mathematical correlation, and Spiral Dynamics theory provides a robust foundation for developing increasingly sophisticated, psychologically informed healthcare messaging strategies that can effectively engage diverse populations across the spiral of human development.



Sources

[1] https://www.linkedin.com/in/tomas-campbell-40202785/
[2] https://www.bps.org.uk/blog/towards-more-inclusive-and-empowering-healthcare-campaigns


2025.02.28
FearpersonqualitiesprojectorganizationalstructureRACIresponsibilitymatrixCritical ChainProject Managementfocus factorJiraempathyleadersbossGermanyChinaPolicyUkraineRussiawarvolatilityuncertaintycomplexityambiguityVUCArelocatejobproblemcountryreasongive upobjectivekeyresultmathematicalpsychologyMBTIHR metricsstandardDEIcorrelationriskscoringmodelGame TheoryPrisoner's Dilemma
Валерий Косенко
Власник производа СааС СДТЕСТ®

Валерии је 1993. године стекао квалификацију социјалног педагога-психолога и од тада примењује своја знања у управљању пројектима.
Валерии је магистрирао и стекао квалификацију менаџера пројекта и програма 2013. Током магистарског програма упознао се са Планом пута пројекта (ГПМ Деутсцхе Геселлсцхафт фур Пројектманагемент е. В.) и Спирал Динамицс.
Валерии је аутор истраживања неизвесности В.У.Ц.А. концепт који користи спиралну динамику и математичку статистику у психологији и 38 међународних анкета.
Овај пост има 0 Коментари
Одговарати на
Отказати одговор
Оставите свој коментар
×
Пронађете ГРЕШКА
ПРОПОСЕ ИОУР исправну верзију
Унесите своју е-маил по жељи
Пошаљите
Поништити, отказати
Redirect to your region's domain sdtest.us ?
YES
NO
Bot
sdtest
1
Здраво! Дозволите да вас питам, да ли сте већ упознати са спиралном динамиком?